In a more practical test, the Mac Mini transcoded a minute-long 4K clip into 1080p in 37 seconds with pure CPU power using Handbrake - the same job took 32 seconds with the GPU. The Mac Mini scored 2,000 points higher than the M1 Max Studio in the Cinebench R23 benchmark, and it was on-par with the MacBook Pro 14-inch with M2 Max.Īpple MacBook Pro 14-inch (Apple M2 Max, 2023)Īpple MacBook Pro 13-inch, (Apple M2, 2022) What's most important for some creatives though is its potential rendering performance. The M1 Ultra-equipped Studio is far faster, not surprisingly, because that's essentially two M1 Max chips joined together. It's slower than the M2 Max in the 14-inch MacBook Pro in GeekBench's CPU benchmark, but it also beats the M1 Max in the Mac Studio. Our review model, which featured the pricier 12-core M2 Pro chip, performed as well as I expected. You'll need a separate adapter to use SD cards with the Mini - a cheap fix, but one that also leads to more desk clutter. The Studio, in comparison, offers two USB-C ports and an SD card slot up front. That could be a bad thing if you need to access its rear ports frequently, though. Unlike the taller and more domineering Mac Studio, the Mini is meant to disappear into your desk, a sliver of power that doesn't need to be seen. Most striking about the Mac mini is its combination of simplicity and functionality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |